Too close for comfort: cyber terrorism and information security across national policies and international diplomacy/ by Dennis Broeders, Fabio Cristiano and Daan Weggemans
Material type: TextPublication details: 2023Subject(s): Online resources: In: Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, Volume 46, Numbers 10-12, October-December 2023, page: 2426-2453Summary: This article analyses the evolution and interplay of national policies and international diplomacy on cyber terrorism within and across the UNSC’s permanent five members and the UN process on cyber norms (GGE and OEWG). First, it reveals how – through the extension of preemptive measures to low-impact cyber activities and online content – national policies progressively articulate cyber terrorism as an issue of information security. Second, it problematizes how – through the adoption of comprehensive and imprecise definitions – the diplomatic language on cyber terrorism might lend international support to those authoritarian regimes keen on leveraging counter-terrorism to persecute domestic oppositions and vulnerable groups. Third, it concludes that – with UN diplomatic efforts increasingly discussing countering (dis)information operations – combining normative debates on cyber terrorism with those on information security requires precision of language to safeguard human rights globally.Item type | Current library | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | CYBER TERRORISM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not for loan |
This article analyses the evolution and interplay of national policies and international diplomacy on cyber terrorism within and across the UNSC’s permanent five members and the UN process on cyber norms (GGE and OEWG). First, it reveals how – through the extension of preemptive measures to low-impact cyber activities and online content – national policies progressively articulate cyber terrorism as an issue of information security. Second, it problematizes how – through the adoption of comprehensive and imprecise definitions – the diplomatic language on cyber terrorism might lend international support to those authoritarian regimes keen on leveraging counter-terrorism to persecute domestic oppositions and vulnerable groups. Third, it concludes that – with UN diplomatic efforts increasingly discussing countering (dis)information operations – combining normative debates on cyber terrorism with those on information security requires precision of language to safeguard human rights globally.
CYBER TERRORISM, SECURITY AND NATIONAL POLICY, NEWARTICLS
There are no comments on this title.