Does 9/11 mark the end of deterrence and the birth of 'detercion'?
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2004Subject(s):
In:
Defence Studies Vol 4 No 1, Spring 2004, pp.40-63 (105)Abstract: Traditional Cold War era deterrence is no longer sufficient to deal with modern terrorist threats. This paper argues for the expansion of deterrence, coercion, and pre-emption to make them more relevant to countering global security challenges in the twenty first century.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | TERRORISM (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 17560-1001 |
Entered on 11/NOV/2004 by CMP
Traditional Cold War era deterrence is no longer sufficient to deal with modern terrorist threats. This paper argues for the expansion of deterrence, coercion, and pre-emption to make them more relevant to countering global security challenges in the twenty first century.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.