Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Abandoning hedging: reconsidering Southeast Asian alignment choices/ Hunter S. Marston

By:

MARSTON Hunter S

Material type: Text

TextPublication details: 2023Subject(s):

In: Contemporary Southeast Asia Vol. 45, No. 1, April 2023, pp.55-81 (19)Summary: In the face of intensifying strategic competition between the United States and China, most Southeast Asian states continue to prefer hedging strategies in an effort to maintain autonomy and flexibility. This involves deepening ties with both superpowers rather than siding with one or the other. Many studies have focused on why and how states hedge, but no scholarly analysis to date has considered why a state would abandon hedging even when it is not facing a direct security threat.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Current library	Call number	Copy number	Status	Date due	Barcode
Journal Article	Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals	SECURITY (Browse shelf(Opens below))	1	Not for loan		69857.1001

Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous								Next
Previous	SECURITY Humour, trust, and tacit knowledge of police and border officers in international police collaboration/	SECURITY Predator's progress: the bureaucratic challenges to the Clinton administration's development and deployment of unmanned aerial vehicles (1993-2001)/	SECURITY The effect of perceived use of body-worn cameras on procedural justice, police legitimacy, police lawfulness, compliance, cooperation, and satisfaction/	SECURITY Abandoning hedging: reconsidering Southeast Asian alignment choices/	SECURITY Linguistic fingerprints and ideological fragmentation: behind enemy minds /	SECURITY Contesting security: multiple modalities, NGOs and the security-migration nexus in Scotland/	SECURITY Digital tools as experts in international peace and security/	Next

In the face of intensifying strategic competition between the United States and China, most Southeast Asian states continue to prefer hedging strategies in an effort to maintain autonomy and flexibility. This involves deepening ties with both superpowers rather than siding with one or the other. Many studies have focused on why and how states hedge, but no scholarly analysis to date has considered why a state would abandon hedging even when it is not facing a direct security threat.

SECURITY

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.