Make or buy? explaining diverging frigate procurement approaches in Denmark and Norway/ Michael Kluth
Material type: TextPublication details: 2022Subject(s): Online resources: In: Defense & Security Analysis Vol.38, Issue. 2, 2022, pp.190-209 (94)Summary: Why did Denmark and Norway opt for respectively a domestic "make" and a "buy" abroad approach when acquiring comparable major surface combatants given both host a capable shipbuilding industry? Three explanations are examined: (1) Balancing concerns inch small states towards "buy" abroad decisions, if requirements are deemed urgent and if junior alliance partners fear abandonment by senior partners. Junior partners by contrast prefer "make at home" if entanglement is a greater concern. (2) National innovation systems can be biased towards large projects, such as complex warship programmes, or have a knowledge diffusion focus emphasising niche capabilities. The former point to a "make" decision whereas the latter is inclined towards "buy." (3) Domestic defence industry advocate "make" decisions with the qualification that weaker firms favour "buy" with offset arrangements. Political executives balance job creation with military capability, but recent adverse domestic procurement experiences may prompt governments to favour "buy."Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | MILITARY (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 69294.1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Why did Denmark and Norway opt for respectively a domestic "make" and a "buy" abroad approach when acquiring comparable major surface combatants given both host a capable shipbuilding industry? Three explanations are examined: (1) Balancing concerns inch small states towards "buy" abroad decisions, if requirements are deemed urgent and if junior alliance partners fear abandonment by senior partners. Junior partners by contrast prefer "make at home" if entanglement is a greater concern. (2) National innovation systems can be biased towards large projects, such as complex warship programmes, or have a knowledge diffusion focus emphasising niche capabilities. The former point to a "make" decision whereas the latter is inclined towards "buy." (3) Domestic defence industry advocate "make" decisions with the qualification that weaker firms favour "buy" with offset arrangements. Political executives balance job creation with military capability, but recent adverse domestic procurement experiences may prompt governments to favour "buy."
MILITARY
There are no comments on this title.