Would armed humanitarian intervention have been justified to protect the Rohingyas?/ Benjamin D. King
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2020Subject(s): Online resources:
In:
Journal of Military Ethics: Vol 19, No. 4, December 2020, pp. 269-284 (63A)Summary: This article addresses the question of whether armed humanitarian intervention would have been morally permissible to protect the Rohingyas. It approaches the question from the perspective of the jus ad bellum criteria of just war theory.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | MYANMAR (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 66090-1001 |
This article addresses the question of whether armed humanitarian intervention would have been morally permissible to protect the Rohingyas. It approaches the question from the perspective of the jus ad bellum criteria of just war theory.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.