War as a workplace: ethical implications of the occupational shift/ Ned Dobos
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2019Subject(s): Online resources:
In:
Journal of Military Ethics Vol 18, No. 3, October 2019, pp. 248-260 (63A)Summary: Soldiering has traditionally been thought of as something radically different from a job or career, but things are changing. Sociologists have observed an "occupational shift" in military service. A corollary is that soldiers are part of the workforce, and an ethical implication is that soldiers are presumptively entitled to the protection of workplace rights. In recent years, the push to have this acknowledged has gained momentum. The present article begins to explore what it would mean in practice if standard workplace rights were extended to armed forces personnel. The question, more specifically, is how this would constrain the war-making privileges of the state.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | MILITARY (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 64821.1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
Soldiering has traditionally been thought of as something radically different from a job or career, but things are changing. Sociologists have observed an "occupational shift" in military service. A corollary is that soldiers are part of the workforce, and an ethical implication is that soldiers are presumptively entitled to the protection of workplace rights. In recent years, the push to have this acknowledged has gained momentum. The present article begins to explore what it would mean in practice if standard workplace rights were extended to armed forces personnel. The question, more specifically, is how this would constrain the war-making privileges of the state.
There are no comments on this title.