Proxies and drones: can international law handle 'invisible threats'?/ Joel Ng
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2020Subject(s): Online resources:
In:
RSIS Commentary No. 010, 14 January 2020 (F31)Summary: The debate over the legality of Qassem Soleimani's assassination misses an essential point: international law is not upheld by moral adherence, but by enlightened self-interest. However, current international law is not working for states given the diffusion of new threats such as drones and non-state proxies and needs rethinking.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | SECURITY (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 64765.1001 |
The debate over the legality of Qassem Soleimani's assassination misses an essential point: international law is not upheld by moral adherence, but by enlightened self-interest. However, current international law is not working for states given the diffusion of new threats such as drones and non-state proxies and needs rethinking.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.
