After JCPOA: American grand strategy toward Iran/ Albert B. Wolf
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2018Subject(s): Online resources:
In:
Comparative Strategy Vol.37, No.1, 2018, pp.22-34 (113)Summary: If grand strategy is a state's theory of how to produce security for itself, what should the U.S. grand strategy be toward Iran? This is an important question that has only grown since the Trump administration announced it would not recertify Iran under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This article lays out four options: rollback, offshore balancing, retrenchment, and engagement. Each strategy has its merits as well as its drawbacks.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | UNITED STATES (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 63143.1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| UNITED STATES From many, one/ | UNITED STATES Progressivism armed? reform and the origins of the modern U.S. Military/ | UNITED STATES Strategic triangle resurfaces: China, Russia, and the United States/ | UNITED STATES After JCPOA: American grand strategy toward Iran/ | UNITED STATES From show of force to naval presence and back again : the U.S navy in the Baltic 1982-2017/ | UNITED STATES The U.S navy in review/ | UNITED STATES Should we stay or should we go? The United States and the Middle East/ |
If grand strategy is a state's theory of how to produce security for itself, what should the U.S. grand strategy be toward Iran? This is an important question that has only grown since the Trump administration announced it would not recertify Iran under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). This article lays out four options: rollback, offshore balancing, retrenchment, and engagement. Each strategy has its merits as well as its drawbacks.
IRAN
There are no comments on this title.