Mission command 2.0: from an individualist to a collectivist model/ Anthony C. King
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2018Subject(s): Online resources:
In:
The US Army War College Quarterly Parameters Vol. 47, No.1, Spring 2017, pp.7-19 (83)Summary: This article specifies the distinctive character of mission command in the twenty-first century by examining the general ships of Stanley McChrystal and James Mattis. These examples contrast the historical attention to immediate tactical tasks with today's application, which involves a deep and enduring interdependence between commanders across echelons so that decisions are closely aligned.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | MISSION COMMAND (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 61056-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| MISSILES The evolution of Russian anti-ship missiles: New concepts and technologies/ | MISSION COMMAND Mission command in the information age: a normal accidents perspective on networked military operations/ | MISSION COMMAND The path to mission command/ | MISSION COMMAND Mission command 2.0: from an individualist to a collectivist model/ | MISSION COMMAND Mission command & zero error tolerance cannot coexist/ | MLIC APR 2012 APR 2012 Management Today (80) | MLIC APR 2013 APR 2013 Management Today (80) |
This article specifies the distinctive character of mission command in the twenty-first century by examining the general ships of Stanley McChrystal and James Mattis. These examples contrast the historical attention to immediate tactical tasks with today's application, which involves a deep and enduring interdependence between commanders across echelons so that decisions are closely aligned.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.