Nationalism and war for territory: from 'divisible' territories to inviolable homelands/ Burak Kadercan

By: Material type: TextTextPublication details: 2018Subject(s): Online resources: In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol.30, No.4, August 2017, pp. 368-393 (93) Summary: How did the rise of nationalism affect patterns of interstate wars? The conventional wisdom in mainstream security studies tends to treat the rise of nationalism as a 'force amplifier' that allowed states to wage war on an unprecedented scale, leading to deadlier-and, consequently, less frequent-wars. By building on emerging interdisciplinary research on territory and territoriality, this essay suggests that there was a second mechanism-complementary to the 'force amplifier' logic-through which the rise of nationalism affected the patterns of interstate war: nationalism changed the 'character' of territories in the modern state system, which, in turn, transformed state preferences over their territorial belongings.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

How did the rise of nationalism affect patterns of interstate wars? The conventional wisdom in mainstream security studies tends to treat the rise of nationalism as a 'force amplifier' that allowed states to wage war on an unprecedented scale, leading to deadlier-and, consequently, less frequent-wars. By building on emerging interdisciplinary research on territory and territoriality, this essay suggests that there was a second mechanism-complementary to the 'force amplifier' logic-through which the rise of nationalism affected the patterns of interstate war: nationalism changed the 'character' of territories in the modern state system, which, in turn, transformed state preferences over their territorial belongings.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.