Nationalism and war for territory: from 'divisible' territories to inviolable homelands/ Burak Kadercan
Material type: TextPublication details: 2018Subject(s): Online resources: In: Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol.30, No.4, August 2017, pp. 368-393 (93) Summary: How did the rise of nationalism affect patterns of interstate wars? The conventional wisdom in mainstream security studies tends to treat the rise of nationalism as a 'force amplifier' that allowed states to wage war on an unprecedented scale, leading to deadlier-and, consequently, less frequent-wars. By building on emerging interdisciplinary research on territory and territoriality, this essay suggests that there was a second mechanism-complementary to the 'force amplifier' logic-through which the rise of nationalism affected the patterns of interstate war: nationalism changed the 'character' of territories in the modern state system, which, in turn, transformed state preferences over their territorial belongings.Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | MISCELLANEOUS (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 61052-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
How did the rise of nationalism affect patterns of interstate wars? The conventional wisdom in mainstream security studies tends to treat the rise of nationalism as a 'force amplifier' that allowed states to wage war on an unprecedented scale, leading to deadlier-and, consequently, less frequent-wars. By building on emerging interdisciplinary research on territory and territoriality, this essay suggests that there was a second mechanism-complementary to the 'force amplifier' logic-through which the rise of nationalism affected the patterns of interstate war: nationalism changed the 'character' of territories in the modern state system, which, in turn, transformed state preferences over their territorial belongings.
There are no comments on this title.