China's counterinsurgency strategy in Tibet and Xinjiang / Liselotte Odgaard and Thomas Galasz Nieslsen.
Material type: TextPublication details: 2014Subject(s): Online resources: In: Journal of Contemporary China : Vol 23 No 87, May 2014, pp.535-555 (102)Summary: China's preferred approach to counterinsurgency appears to rely heavily on hard power and imposition. This article considers from the Chinese government's perspective the application of these policies against ethnic unrest in Tibet and Xinjiang even if these events would not ordinarily be considered insurgencies. Looks at the role of China's political structures and nationality dynamics. Also considers external factors including trade routes (the Karakoram highway), relations with e.g. Pakistan, and briefly considers counterinsurgency strategies of some Asian states. Concludes that "... China's political structure is inherently biased towards hard power and imposition."Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | CHINA (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 43257-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
China's preferred approach to counterinsurgency appears to rely heavily on hard power and imposition. This article considers from the Chinese government's perspective the application of these policies against ethnic unrest in Tibet and Xinjiang even if these events would not ordinarily be considered insurgencies. Looks at the role of China's political structures and nationality dynamics. Also considers external factors including trade routes (the Karakoram highway), relations with e.g. Pakistan, and briefly considers counterinsurgency strategies of some Asian states. Concludes that "... China's political structure is inherently biased towards hard power and imposition."
There are no comments on this title.