Towards a reasonable standard for analysis : how right, how often on which issues? / Mark M Lowenthal
Material type:
TextPublication details: 2008Subject(s):
In:
Intelligence And National Security Vol 23, No 3, June 2008, pp.303-315 (99)Summary: Starting from the premise that intelligence analysis cannot be perfect, this article considers what should be considered acceptable and how such a set of standards could be arrived at. In doing so it notes the considerable difficulties to be overcome in achieving such an outcome.
| Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals | INTELLIGENCE SERVICES (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Not for loan | 24464-1001 |
Browsing Mindef Library & Info Centre shelves, Shelving location: Journals Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
| INTELLIGENCE SERVICES At arms length or at the elbow? : explaining the distance between analysts and decisionmakers / | INTELLIGENCE SERVICES The role, organization, and methods of MI5 / | INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Documenting the differences between American and British intelligence reports / | INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Towards a reasonable standard for analysis : how right, how often on which issues? / | INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Intelligence analysis / | INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Glimpses into the gems of American intelligence : the President's Daily Brief and the National Intelligence Estimate / | INTELLIGENCE SERVICES Democracy and effectiveness : adapting intelligence for the fight against terrorism / |
Starting from the premise that intelligence analysis cannot be perfect, this article considers what should be considered acceptable and how such a set of standards could be arrived at. In doing so it notes the considerable difficulties to be overcome in achieving such an outcome.
There are no comments on this title.
Log in to your account to post a comment.