Technological hedging and differentiated responses of Southeast Asian countries to U.S.–China technological competition: (Record no. 48107)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 03014nam a22002057a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 48107
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250610152244.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250610b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name ZHAO Xinlei
Relator term author
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Technological hedging and differentiated responses of Southeast Asian countries to U.S.–China technological competition:
Remainder of title a case study on artificial intelligence (AI) /
Statement of responsibility, etc. Xinlei Zhao
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2025
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. The rise of artificial intelligence (AI), represented by ChatGPT, has triggered a new wave of technological competition between nations. Major powers like China and the United States, backed by abundant resources, dominate the discourse and hold a significant advantage in the AI field. However, as the technological rivalry between these two countries intensifies, AI represents a classic ‘double-edged sword’ for many small and medium-sized countries. Therefore, the core argument of this paper is that the AI policies of small and medium-sized countries are not simply about bandwagoning or depending on major powers. At their core, these policies represent a complex form of technological hedging. External security concerns drive small and medium-sized countries to adopt hedging as a primary strategy, while internal interest preferences influence the varying intensities of this technological hedging. The findings of this paper indicate that small countries’ technological policies can be categorized into three models: strong hedging, medium hedging, and weak hedging. Different paths of technological hedging reflect the rational balance these nations make between security and economic interests in different contexts. The case of AI development in ASEAN also demonstrates the significant imbalance between member states. Singapore is classified as a technological frontrunner, while Malaysia, Indonesia, and Vietnam are categorized as followers. Laos, Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, Brunei, and the Philippines are considered latecomers in the field of AI. In terms of specific AI policies, Singapore and Vietnam adopt a strong technological hedging strategy, seeking more cooperation and interaction with the U.S. or other countries due to caution and concerns about China’s technological security. Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and the Philippines follow a medium hedging strategy, while Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Brunei adopt a weak hedging approach. The differences in hedging intensity are primarily due to varying internal legitimacy pathways and the strength of backup resources. ASEAN member states pursue different technological paths based on their own circumstances to promote AI development.
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
General subdivision ASEAN
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element CHINA-US RIVALRY
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element TECHNOLOGICAL DIPLOMACY
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Related parts The Pacific Review, Volume 38, Number 3, May 2025, pages: 502-533
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2024.2408010">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09512748.2024.2408010</a>
Public note Click here for full text
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal Articles
Suppress in OPAC No
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Mindef Library & Info Centre Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals 10/06/2025   ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 10/06/2025 10/06/2025 Journal Articles