Populism in Taiwan: (Record no. 47986)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field 02099nam a22002177a 4500
001 - CONTROL NUMBER
control field 47986
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field 20250519152031.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field 250519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name HSU Szu-Yun
Relator term Author
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title Populism in Taiwan:
Remainder of title Rethinking the Neo-liberalism-Populism Nexus/
Statement of responsibility, etc. Szu-Yun Hsu
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Date of publication, distribution, etc. 2024
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc. Contemporary scholarship on populism, albeit involving divergent approaches and polarised diagnoses of populism’s political impacts, commonly attributes the recent populist surge to the peril of neo-liberal encroachment. However, such a neo-liberal–populist proposition encounters discrepant experiences when applied in non-Western contexts, including in East Asia. To recalibrate the conceptual framework, this article employs Gramsci-inspired scholarship on hegemony and populism – the notion of “the integral state” and non-reductionist class politics in particular – and utilises Taiwan as a case to expound upon the entanglement of democratisation, neo-liberalisation, and various forms of populist politics. Situating the post-2000 surge of multiple popular movements in Taiwan’s hegemonic restructuring since the 1980s, this article identifies a course of bifurcated development between “liberal populism of the bourgeois hegemony” and the “neo-liberal populism of the multitude” that embodies various ways in which neo-liberalism intersects with populist politics. Highlighting the constant boundary-redrawing of the integral state and its associated class politics along the hegemonic restructuring processes, Taiwan’s case exemplifies a critical approach to rethinking the over-determined relations between populism and neo-liberalism for other East Asian states and beyond.
598 ## - BULLETIN HEADING
Bulletin Heading POPULISM, NEO-LIBERAL, POLITIC, MULTITUDE
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element POPULISM
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element NEO-LIBERALISATION
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM
Topical term or geographic name entry element MULTITUDE
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY
Related parts Journal of Contemporary Asia, Number 3, Volume 54, 2024, Page 478-501
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2174167">https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2174167</a>
Public note Click here for full text
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type Journal
Suppress in OPAC No
Holdings
Withdrawn status Lost status Source of classification or shelving scheme Damaged status Not for loan Home library Current library Shelving location Date acquired Total checkouts Full call number Date last seen Price effective from Koha item type
    Dewey Decimal Classification     Mindef Library & Info Centre Mindef Library & Info Centre Journals 19/05/2025   POPULISM 19/05/2025 19/05/2025 Journal