Zero-COVID or coexistence? It is a question: (Record no. 47984)
[ view plain ]
| 000 -LEADER | |
|---|---|
| fixed length control field | 02217nam a22002057a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
| control field | 47984 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
| control field | OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
| control field | 20250519150144.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
| fixed length control field | 250519b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | LUO Xi |
| Relator term | author |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
| Title | Zero-COVID or coexistence? It is a question: |
| Remainder of title | examining ideological factors underlying the Chinese public’s attitude to health policies / |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. | Xi Luo, Hepeng Jia and Jingjie Qian |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2025 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
| Summary, etc. | The COVID-19 pandemic reveals an obvious ideological influence on people’s health decisions worldwide. However, little research has examined such an effect on China’s public attitude to health issues. This article tries to fill the gap by examining how conventional factors linked to health behaviours – e.g. perceived threats, scientific knowledge, and trust in science—and ideological beliefs jointly influence the Chinese public’s attitude to the zero-COVID policies. Utilizing a national quota sample (n = 1,021) collected in April 2022 when Shanghai’s lockdown resulted in numerous online protests, this study found that perceived severity of COVID-19 infection, trust in science, left-leaning ideologies, and nationalism scores were associated with supporting the zero-COVID policies. Objective scientific judgments did not influence their views. Moreover, people whose ideological stances were closer to the official lines (political left and nationalism) were less likely to associate a zero-COVID attitude with perceived threats but more likely to link their trust in science to their support for the zero-COVID policy. The findings here provided empirical proof from China to the booming research agenda on the politicization of science and health communication while expanding our understanding of how ideological beliefs may have distorted scientific cognitions and health decisions. |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
| Topical term or geographic name entry element | COVID-19 |
| General subdivision | IDEOLOGIES |
| -- | SCIENTIFIC RECOGNITION |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | JIA Hepeng |
| Relator term | author |
| 700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
| Personal name | QIAN Jingjie |
| Relator term | author |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
| Related parts | Journal of Contemporary China, Volume 34, Number 151, January 2025, pages: 96-116 |
| 856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
| Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10670564.2024.2302483">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10670564.2024.2302483</a> |
| Public note | Click here for full text |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
| Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type | Journal Article |
| Suppress in OPAC | No |
| Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total checkouts | Full call number | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dewey Decimal Classification | Mindef Library & Info Centre | Mindef Library & Info Centre | Journals | 19/05/2025 | COVID-19 | 19/05/2025 | 19/05/2025 | Journal Article |