MARC details
| 000 -LEADER |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
01694nam a22002297a 4500 |
| 001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
|---|
| control field |
47411 |
| 003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
|---|
| control field |
OSt |
| 005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
|---|
| control field |
20240823101255.0 |
| 008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
|---|
| fixed length control field |
240823b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
| 100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
|---|
| Personal name |
PAQUIN Jonathan |
| 245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
|---|
| Title |
The united states facing allies' populist blackmail: |
| Remainder of title |
why the Philippines and Turkey threatened to realign with China and Russia/ |
| Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Jonathan Paquin |
| 260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
|---|
| Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2024 |
| 520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
|---|
| Summary, etc. |
Given China and Russia’s increasingly aggressive behaviour, balance of threat theory posits that formal US allies should close ranks behind the United States. Recent developments, however, have somewhat undermined these claims, as the president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, and the president of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, publicly threatened to break ranks with Washington and to realign with China and Russia respectively. How can we make sense of such defiant behaviour? This article argues that populist blackmail elucidates this phenomenon and compares it to three alternative propositions: conventional bandwagoning, bandwagoning for profit, and hard hedging. Furthermore, the article infers that two concomitant factors – political grievances and the perceived lack of security assurance – propelled both presidents to resort to blackmail. |
| 598 ## - BULLETIN HEADING |
|---|
| Bulletin Heading |
BALANCE OF THREAT THEORY, ALLIANCE POLITICS, BLACKMAIL, BARGAINING POWER, POLITICAL GRIEVANCES, NEWARTICLS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
BALANCE OF THREAT THEORY |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
ALLIANCE POLITICS |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
BLACKMAIL |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
BARGAINING POWER |
| 650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
|---|
| Topical term or geographic name entry element |
POLITICAL GRIEVANCES |
| 773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
|---|
| Related parts |
European Journal of International Security, Volume 9, Issue 2, May 2024, pg. 160-179 |
| 942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
|---|
| Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Dewey Decimal Classification |
| Koha item type |
Journal Article |
| Suppress in OPAC |
No |
