MARC details
000 -LEADER |
fixed length control field |
02144nam a22002057a 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER |
control field |
47046 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER |
control field |
OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION |
control field |
20240516132438.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION |
fixed length control field |
240516b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Personal name |
ROD Thornton |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT |
Title |
Learning the lessons of COVID-19: |
Remainder of title |
homeland resilience in the United Kingdom - is it now time for both a dedicated civil defense organization and a paramilitary force?/ |
Statement of responsibility, etc. |
Thornton Rod and Marina Miron |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. |
2023 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. |
Summary, etc. |
The United Kingdom’s homeland resilience capacity is poor. The COVID-19 pandemic proved this. Back in 2019, the UK had been labeled as the best prepared country in the world for a pandemic. And yet, by 2020, and once COVID-19 had struck, the UK became “unequivocally” the hardest hit country in Europe – particularly in terms of excess mortality. In this article it is argued that the UK’s continental neighbors coped better than the UK because they had better homeland resilience capacity. This was provided by their having civil defense organizations, paramilitary forces and militaries which are specifically designed to contribute to homeland emergencies. The UK, in contrast and almost uniquely in the world, lacks both civil defense and paramilitary bodies and, moreover, it has armed forces that are not actually structured to provide help in domestic emergencies. Given the problems highlighted during COVID-19, is it now time for the UK to set up its own bodies specifically tasked with alleviating domestic emergencies? This article explores this question by comparing the UK’s pandemic response with that of Spain – a country which, according to all available data, should have performed worse than the UK. But it did not. Why? |
598 ## - BULLETIN HEADING |
Bulletin Heading |
HOMELAND RESILLIENCE, UK DEFENSE POLICY, COVID-19, NEWARTICLS |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM |
Topical term or geographic name entry element |
HOMELAND RESILIENCE |
General subdivision |
UK DEFENSE POLICY |
-- |
COVID-19 |
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME |
Personal name |
MIRON Marina |
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY |
Related parts |
Defence Studies (Journal of Military and Strategic Studies), Volume 23, Number 1, March 2023, page: 105-125 |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS |
Uniform Resource Identifier |
<a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110481">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14702436.2022.2110481</a> |
Public note |
Click here for full text |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) |
Source of classification or shelving scheme |
Dewey Decimal Classification |
Koha item type |
Journal Article |
Suppress in OPAC |
No |