State personhood and ontological security as a framework of existence: (Record no. 46931)
[ view plain ]
000 -LEADER | |
---|---|
fixed length control field | 02051nam a22001937a 4500 |
001 - CONTROL NUMBER | |
control field | 46931 |
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER | |
control field | OSt |
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION | |
control field | 20240419095808.0 |
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION | |
fixed length control field | 240419b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d |
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME | |
Personal name | KRICKEL-CHOI Nina C |
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT | |
Title | State personhood and ontological security as a framework of existence: |
Remainder of title | moving beyond identity, discovering sovereignty/ |
Statement of responsibility, etc. | Nina C. Krickel-Choi |
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. | |
Date of publication, distribution, etc. | 2024 |
520 ## - SUMMARY, ETC. | |
Summary, etc. | The concepts of ‘self’ and ‘identity’ are often implicitly conflated in constructivist research, limiting our understanding of important theoretical issues. The Ontological Security Studies (OSS) literature provides one example of this, often reducing a concern with ‘security of the self’ to a matter of identity, thereby limiting OSS’ analytical reach. This article draws from the writings of Laing and Giddens to make the case for keeping ‘self’ and ‘identity’ analytically distinct. Understanding ontological security as a multidimensional framework meant to affirm the self’s existence, it proposes to see ‘identity’ as just one dimension of ontological security, and to conceptualise ‘self’ in terms of personhood. Such a reading allows us to grasp the discursive and ritualistic institution of sovereignty as an existential framework on which the personhood, and therefore ontological security, of all states depends. Thus, OSS would benefit from considering ontological security beyond identity. Beyond this, the article shows that distinguishing more clearly between ‘self’ and ‘identity’ illuminates the debate on state personhood in IR, indicating that paying more attention to these key concepts would be helpful for constructivist research more generally. |
598 ## - BULLETIN HEADING | |
Bulletin Heading | SECURITY FRAMEWORK, NEWARTICLS |
650 ## - SUBJECT ADDED ENTRY--TOPICAL TERM | |
Topical term or geographic name entry element | SECURITY FRAMEWORK |
773 ## - HOST ITEM ENTRY | |
Related parts | CRIA: The Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Volume 37, Number 1, February 2024, page: 3-21 |
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS | |
Uniform Resource Identifier | <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09557571.2022.2108761">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09557571.2022.2108761</a> |
Public note | Click here for full text |
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA) | |
Source of classification or shelving scheme | Dewey Decimal Classification |
Koha item type | Journal Article |
Suppress in OPAC | No |
Withdrawn status | Lost status | Source of classification or shelving scheme | Damaged status | Not for loan | Home library | Current library | Shelving location | Date acquired | Total checkouts | Full call number | Date last seen | Price effective from | Koha item type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dewey Decimal Classification | Mindef Library & Info Centre | Mindef Library & Info Centre | Journals | 19/04/2024 | SECURITY FRAMEWORK | 19/04/2024 | 19/04/2024 | Journal Article |